South African insurance analysis
Insights
Short-term insurance case law, technical coverage analysis, ombudsman case outcomes and SASRIA special-risk news - explained clearly for South African policyholders and brokers.
Case Law

Mavela v Outsurance: False Claim Information and Alcohol Exclusions
The Free State High Court upheld Outsurance’s repudiation of a vehicle claim after finding that the insured’s account of the crash was false and that the evidence supported an inference of driving under the influence of alcohol.

King Price v Concise Consulting: When an Employee’s False Statement Does Not Defeat a Motor Claim
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that an employee’s untrue statements during an insurer’s later investigation were not automatically attributable to the insured company. The case explains why policy wording, agency and the timing of a claim matter when an insurer relies on an honesty or forfeiture clause.

Seepi v King Price: Why Undisclosed Minor Incidents Can Defeat a Motor Claim
The Gauteng High Court dismissed a Mercedes claim after the insured admitted he had not disclosed two earlier minor incidents. The judgment also shows that a policyholder must prove the insured accident occurred as alleged.
Technical Analysis
Ombudsman Case Outcomes
SASRIA & Special Risk Insurance
Sasria and IISA Skills Programmes Aim to Build South Africa’s Short-Term Insurance Talent Pipeline
Sasria and the Insurance Institute of South Africa have introduced two development programmes intended to combine NQF Level 5 learning with workplace exposure for 54 prospective insurance professionals. The initiative focuses on emerging brokers, loss adjusters, youth employment and broader sector transformation.
Sasria profit rises to R4.5bn as capital recovery supports future risk plans
Sasria reported a 34.1% rise in annual profit to R4.5 billion for the year ended 31 March 2025. Higher investment income, improved insurance results and lower net reinsurance costs lifted own funds to R18.6 billion, strengthening its ability to absorb severe special-risk losses while it considers a broader future role.
Decentralisation for Natural Catastrophes: What It Could Mean for Insurance Resilience
Natural hazards, civil unrest and terrorism can all cause severe losses, but their risk patterns differ. Decentralised catastrophe planning may help spread decision-making, improve local response and strengthen insurance resilience.
Latest across all topics
- Mavela v Outsurance: False Claim Information and Alcohol Exclusions
- King Price v Concise Consulting: When an Employee’s False Statement Does Not Defeat a Motor Claim
- Homeowners' Association Insurance in South Africa: The Definitive Guide for Estate Boards
- Seepi v King Price: Why Undisclosed Minor Incidents Can Defeat a Motor Claim
- Renasa v Watson: Insurer’s Burden of Proof in Arson Fire Claims
- Cell Phone Insurance Claims: SIM Cards, Device Updates and Theft Exclusions
